Ask a Patient Opinion Poll
Should the FDA allow abbreviated (instead of complete) lists of risk warnings in TV commercials for prescription drugs?
(Total Votes: 118)
Yes (15.3%) | |
|
No (81.4%) | |
|
Not Sure (1.7%) | |
|
Other (describe below) (1.7%) | |
|
Voter Comments (the following are opinions of readers and not AskaPatient.com)
• Like cigarettes & whiskey, get drug ads off TV.
• There should be NO commercials for prescription drugs allowed on TV!
• Just like smoking ads, get rid of RX ads completely!!
• stop the ads entirely
• All the warnings make people aware of possible risks,
• Full disclosure should be mandatory!
• Listening to those commercials, and hearing thar list of side effects actually makes me want to not
• it's better to know what may happen.
• Public should have knowledge of what they are taking.
• Pharma should have no way out of full disclosure
• List EVERYTHING!
• This is only to help drug industry
• We need FULL DISCLOSURE, no to abbreviation.
• Absolutely should not allow abbreviations on TV or anywhere, except for info directed towards physicians
• All warnings need to be advertised
• shouldn't even allow tv ads of rx drugs
• ZERO ADS for PHARMA DRUGS
• BE SAFE!!!!!!
• All drugs should have independent testing before released to the public but they are not.
• Should be required
• Risks and side effects should be given to consumers
• should not be advertised AT ALL
• Some doctors quickly prescribe new drugs while being unaware of all the side effects!
• Advertising should not be allowed. Period!
Related Articles
• List of FDA-funded studies on Drug Advertising/Promotion
• Will this be an end to the long list of side effects in drug ads?